|
Track & Field and Athletics: #1 Sports site with latest training info for coaches and self-coached athletes
|
Custom Search
|
The Outer Unit
by Paul Chek
AUTHOR
Paul Chek is an expert in the fields of corrective exercise and high performance conditioning and is the founder of the C.H.E.K Institute in San Diego, California. For over fifteen years he has traveled around the world lecturing, consulting and giving seminars. Paul Chek has been a consultant to the Los Angeles Chiropractic College, the Chicago Bulls, the Denver Nuggets, the US Army Boxing team, Australia's Canberra Raiders and the US Air Force Academy.
ABSTRACT
The
author stated that abdominal exercises can be performed in various ways and
asks if the common exercises really improve the functionality of the abdominal
muscles. In this article the author explains first, the anatomy of the outer
unit, second, he describes the function of the four sling systems of the outer
unit and, finally, he demonstrates exercises targeting one or all of the sling
systems in a methodical manner.
In the previous article titled The Inner Unit A New Frontier In Abdominal
Training, we discussed the function of the transversus abdominis, multifidus, diaphragm and pelvic floor musculature with regard to their significant
functions as stabilizers of both the spine and extremities. The main message
of this article was that stabilization of the core via the inner unit must
always precede force generation by the core or extremities.
The scope of this article will be, first, to explain the anatomy of the outer
unit, second, to describe the function of the four sling systems of the outer
unit and, finally, to demonstrate exercises targeting one or all of the sling
systems in a methodical manner.
Functional Anatomy of the outer unit
The outer unit consists primarily of phasic muscles (Table 1), although there
are many muscles such as the oblique abdominals, quadratus lumborum, hamstrings
and adductors which serve a dual role, acting in a tonic role as stabilizers
and a phasic role as prime movers. To be technically correct, we may say that
outer unit functions are predominantly phasic functions (geared toward
movement).

Superficial to the musculature of the inner unit are the
outer unit systems, sometimes referred to as slings. The Deep Longitudinal
System (DLS) is
composed of the erector muscles of the spine and their investing fascia. The
spinal erectors communicate with the biceps femoris through the sacrotuberous
ligament of the pelvis and to the lower extremity via the peroneus longus
muscle (Figure 1).
The Posterior Oblique System (PS) or sling consists primarily of the latissimus dorsi and the contralateral gluteus maxim us (Figure 2).

The Anterior Oblique System (AS) consists of a working relationship
between the oblique abdominal muscles and the contralateral adductor
musculature and the intervening anterior abdominal fascia (Figure 3).

The Lateral System (LS) (Figure 4) consists of a working relationship between the gluteus medius, gluteus minimus and ipsilateral adductors (1,3). Porterfield and DeRosa (3) indicate a working relationship between the gluteus medius and adductors of one leg with the opposite quadratus lumborum. The author's clinical experience strongly suggests that the oblique musculature is synergistic with the quadratus lumborum during lateral sling functions such as those seen in Figure 4.

THE OUTER UNIT SYSTEMS IN ACTION
The deep longitudinal and posterior systems
To better understand how the DLS and PS function, we will explore their actions
in what is certainly one of our most primal movement patterns, gait (walking).
While walking, there is a consistent low level activation of the inner unit
muscles to provide the necessary joint stiffness to protect the joints and
support the actions of the larger outer unit muscles. Recruitment of the
inner unit muscles will fluctuate in intensity as needed to maintain adequate
joint stiffness and support, as the inertial forces of limb movement, kinetic
forces and intradiscal pressures increase.
As we walk, we swing one leg and the opposite arm forward in what is termed
counter rotation. Just prior to foot strike, the hamstrings become active
. The DLS, uses the thoracolumbar fascia and paraspinal muscle system to
transmit kinetic energy above the pelvis, while using the biceps femoris as a
communicating link between the pelvis and lower extremity. For example, Vleeming
shows that the biceps femoris communicates with the peroneus longus at the
fibular head, transmitting approximately 18% of the contraction force of the
biceps femoris through the fascial system into the peroneus longus.
Interestingly, the anterior tibialis, like the peroneus longus, attaches to the
plantar side of the proximal head of the first metatarsal. The significance of
this relationship is appreciated when considering that there is recruitment of
the biceps femoris and the anterior tibialis just prior to heel strike in
concert with the peroneal muscles, which act as dynamic stabilizers of the
lower leg and foot. Dorsiflexion of the foot and activation of the biceps
femoris just prior to heel strike, therefore, serves to "wind up" the thoracolumbar fascia mechanism as a means of stabilizing the lower extremity and
storing kinetic energy that will be released during the propulsive phase of gait
(4).
As you can see by observing Figure 2, just prior to heel strike the gluteus
maximus reaches maximum stretch as the latissimus dorsi is being stretched by
the forward swing of the opposite arm. Heel strike signifies transition into the
propulsive phase of gait, at which time the gluteus maximus contraction is
superimposed upon that of the hamstrings. Activation of the gluteus maximus occurs in concert with activation of the
contralateral latissimus dorsi, which is now extending the arm in concert with
the propelling leg. The synergistic contraction of the gluteus
maximus and latissimus dorsi creates tension in the thoracolumbar fascia, which
will be released in a pulse of energy that will assist the muscles of locomotion, reducing the metabolic cost of gait.
The anterior oblique system
The concept of the Anterior Oblique System (AS Figure 3) appears to have
become popular very recently. A review of the literature shows that spiral
concept of muscle-joint action was understood as integral to human movement and
corrective exercise by Robert W. Lovett, M.D. and by anatomist Raymond A. Dart
in the early 1900's.
To clarify the point that movement originates in the spine (core), Gracovetsky
describes torque generation by an S-shaped spinal column. He exemplifies
the point that the legs are not responsible for gait, but merely instruments of
expression, by showing that a man with no legs whatsoever can walk. In
both the examples of what Gracovetsky calls the spinal engine, it is evident that the kinetic and potential energies of the oblique abdominal
musculature, in concert with other core muscles, are primarily responsible for
creating the torque that drives the spinal engine; the oblique abdominal being
best situated to create rotary torque.
The oblique abdominals, like the adductors, serve to provide
stability and mobility in gait. When looking at the EMG recordings of the
oblique abdominals during gait and superimposing them upon the cycle of adductor
activity in gait demonstrated by Inman, it is clear that both sets of
muscles contribute to stability at the initiation of the stance phase of gait,
as well as to rotating the pelvis and pulling the leg through during the swing
phase of gait. As the speed of walking progresses to running, activation of the
anterior oblique system becomes more prominent.
The AS is very important, particularly in sprinting, where the limbs and torso
must be accelerated. The demands on the AS are great in multi-directional sports
such as tennis, soccer, football, basketball and hockey. In such sporting
environments the AS must not only contribute to accelerating the body, but also
to changing direction and decelerating it. One need not see an EMG study to
appreciate the strong contribution of the AS; just ask anyone that has
experienced an abdominal strain! Accelerating, decelerating and changing
directions are all activities that result in immediate pain in the presence of
both abdominal and groin strains or tears.
AS functions can be appreciated when running in sand. Because
sand gives away during the initiation of the stance and propulsive phases of
gait, the impulse timing of ground reaction forces is disrupted, resulting in
poor use of the thoracolumbar fascia, or what Margaria calls the smart spring
system. The result is that you must muscle your way through the sand. Many
athletes having performed sand sprints, will note abdominal fatigue in the
following day or two after the sand sprints. This is due to the increased
activation of the AS to compensate for the lost kinetic, potential and muscular
energy, which is usually stored and released in part by the thoracolumbar fascia
system. Gracovetsky states that wearing soft soled sporting shoes, as athletes
often do today, can easily disrupt the body's timing mechanism, which could very
well result in increased work and may result in injury.
During explosive activities, such as swinging a sledge hammer (Figure 5), the AS
serves critical function, stabilizing as in gait, yet assisting in propelling
the hammer. Trunk flexion and rotation, as a closed chain movement atop of the
lead leg, is generated by the adductors as they assist in trunk flexion and
internal rotation of the pelvis and assisted by gravity. Activation of the
adductors
occurs in concert with activation of the ipsilateal (stance leg side) internal
oblique and contralateral (throwing arm side) external oblique, pulling the
trunk in the necessary direction to propel the shoulder/arm complex. The forces
of the shoulder/arm unit summate with those of the legs and trunk below to
produce a powerful hammer swing. Here one can clearly see the phasic functions
of the AS at work.

The lateral system
Porterfield and De Rosa (3) suggest that functional anatomy dictates that the
lateral system provide essential frontal plane stability. While walking, the LS
will be active at heel strike (initiation of stance phase), providing frontal
plane stability. This is accomplished by a force-couple action between the
gluteus medius and minimus pulling the iliac crest toward the stable femur while
the opposite quadratus lumborum and oblique abdominal musculature assist by
elevating the ilium. This action is necessary to help create the freeway space
needed to swing the leg in gait, particularly when you consider the terrain we
ambulated across during developmental years.
During functional activities such as participating in Step class (Figure 4) or
simply walking up stairs (Figure 6), the LS plays a critical role, stabilizing
the spine in the frontal plane. Stability in the frontal plane is very important
to the longevity of the lumbar spine because frontal plane motions of the lumbar
and thoracic spine are mechanically coupled with transverse plane motions;
excessive amounts of either will quickly aggravate spinal joints.

The LS provides stability that not only protects the working spinal and hip
joints, but is a necessary contributor to overall stability of the pelvis and
trunk. Should the trunk become unstable, the diminished stability will
compromise ones ability to generate the forces necessary to move the swing leg
quickly, as required by many work and sports environments. Attempts to move the
swing leg, or generate force with the stance leg during gait and other
functional activities, can easily disrupt the sacroiliac joints and pubic
symphysis and cause kinetic dysfunction in joints throughout the entire kinetic
chain.
A classic example of distal expression of LS dysfunction was illustrated by
Sahrmann. She described a lateral shift of an athlete's center of gravity
over the subtalar joint while going through the stance phase of gait
(Trendelenburg's Sign) resulting in an inversion ankle sprain. Since attending
her course in 1992, the author has found gluteus medius weakness and
contralateral low back pain due to quadratus lumborum overload common among
athletes exhibiting recurring ankle sprain.
THE OUTER UNIT AS A STABILIZING SYSTEM
Although the outer unit is thought of as a phasic system, (a system for moving
the body) by most, it does provide crucial stabilizer functions. We must
remember that the muscles of the inner unit are relatively small, with less
potential to generate force than the large outer unit muscles.
The inner unit muscles are concerned with providing joint stiffness and
segmental stability. They work for extended periods of time at low levels of
maximal contraction. The outer unit muscles, while very well oriented for moving
the body, are also very important to stability, often serving to protect the
inner unit muscles, spinal ligaments and joints from damaging overload. For
example, consider this common scenario:
The coach instructs two football players to engage in an oblique medicine ball
toss drill. One player is much bigger and stronger than the other, as the other
player finds out as he attempts to catch the 8 kg. (17.5 lbs.) medicine ball
traveling at him at over 60 kph (40mph)! The smaller player does not have the
strength in his outer unit to decelerate the ball and is forced into end-range
trunk flexion and rotation, traumatizing his lower lumbar discs, ligaments and
intrinsic spinal muscles (multifidus, rotatores, intertransversarii and
interspinales).
Regardless of how well conditioned the inner unit of the smaller player may have
been, lack of strength in his outer unit relative to his partner, or the demands
of the task at hand resulted in inner unit overload and injury! With careful
scrutiny of most activities in the work or sports environment, you will find
that good eccentric strength in the outer unit systems is critical to protecting
the inner unit from damage. Protection of the inner unit through proper
conditioning of the outer unit is a worthy goal when one considers that optimal
proprioception is dependant upon the health of the inner unit muscles and the
joints they protect!
A MODERN APPROACH TO EXERCISING THE OUTER UNIT
Now that we have taken a detailed look at the anatomy and function of the outer
unit, it should be clear that modern exercise technology has taken us a long way
from conditioning the outer unit systems the way they were designed to work! For
example, can you see any way the following exercises condition the outer unit
systems in such a way that they could provide carryover to most functional work
or sport activities?
♦ Crunch on Floor
♦ Crunch Machines of all types
♦ Sit-up
♦ Hanging Leg Raises of All Types
♦ Bench Press
♦ Leg Press
♦ Seated Row Machines?
I could go on, filling the page with exercises that do very little to enhance
function. Many of you will no doubt recognize the above exercises as traditional
bodybuilding exercises. What has happened? Only a few years back in the days of
Bill Pearl, bodybuilders were building beautiful physiques with functional
exercises like squats, lunges, barbell rows, cable rows, deadlifts and the like.
Today, we are overrun by the machine era, the era of the aesthetic emotional
hook so carefully used by the machine manufacturers to convince you that you
will look better using their machines.
Our bodies were not designed to exercise on machines, they were designed to
function in the wild. We are designed for three-dimensional freedom, not two
dimensional guided, unrealistic exercise that encourages muscle imbalance
between those muscles used to stabilize and those used in a phasic manner for
any given movement. The motor programs developed on machines are of little use
to the body for anything other than pushing or pulling the levers of that very
machine during that very exercise. This limits functional carryover to those
that operate cranes, excavators, bulldozers, and buses for a living; they are
about the only people that must apply force to levers in a seated, supported,
two-dimensional environment.
OUT WITH THE NEW AND IN WITH THE OLD!
Using your new understanding of the outer unit systems,
carefully analyze such functional pushing and pulling exercises as the single
arm standing cable row (Figure 7) and standing single arm cable push (Figure 8). You will see
all outer unit systems being conditioned simultaneously, jU5t as they are used
in most of our work and sport environments.


Medicine ball exercise, like free weight training, was much
more popular in the 40s, 50s, 60s, and 70s than it is today. Great athletes of
those decades used exercises such as the oblique medicine ball toss and
push-pass, not to mention almost 100 other variations of medicine ball
exercises.
The Swiss Ball can be used to effectively condition the outer
unit systems in three-dimensional movement while providing unloading
opportunities for those recovering from injury. For example, analyze the Supine
Lateral Ball Roll
(Figure 9) and see if you can determine which outer unit systems are being used
and categorize them in the order of demand during this exercise. This will be a
great start toward a better understanding of functional exercise.

Conclusion
The outer unit consists of four systems, the deep longitudinal, posterior
oblique, anterior oblique and lateral. These systems are dependent upon the
inner unit for the joint stiffness and stability necessary to create an
effective force generation platform. Failure of the inner unit to work in the
presence of outer unit demand often results in muscle imbalance, joint injury
and poor performance. The outer unit cannot be effectively conditioned in
patterns of movement that carryover to function when using modern bodybuilding
machines. Effective conditioning of the outer unit should include exercises that
require integrated function of the inner and outer units, using movement
patterns common to any given client's work or sport environment. .
FROM: IAAF/NSA 1-2.00

Related Articles:
Core stabilisation training for middle and long-distance runners
THE INNER UNIT- A NEW FRONTIER IN ABDOMINAL TRAINING
THE FUNCTION OF THE MID-TORSO IN SPORT ACTIVITIES
3 February 2012 - Hong Kong - With so many good African, particularly Kenyan marathoners around nowadays, it takes a bit of initiative to get into foreign races if you?re not one of the sub-2:10 brigade. So when Julius Maisei heard that the Standard Chartered Hong Kong Marathon ? an IAAF Bronze Label Event - was paying good prize money without an overly talented field, he chanced a thousand dollars on an air fare and a hotel room last year.
3 February 2012 - Moscow, Russia - It?s very cold in Moscow: the temperature in some regions of this huge city is minus 20 degrees C. But no doubt on Sunday (5) the Vladimir Kutz Arena will be crammed with fans of athletics. since the 'Russian Winter', the second IAAF Indoor Permit Meeting of 2012, is always adored by the Moscow public.
3 February 2012 - Long Jumper Darya Klishina, a regular correspondent of the IAAF via the IAAF Online Diaries, has taken time off her busy schedule to answer her fans? questions received via the IAAF World Athletics Club Facebook page. Darya received almost 200 questions ? here are the ones she selected?
3 February 2012 ? Linz, Austria - Tipped all week long as the marquee event, a riveting hurdle race between Americans Yvette Lewis and Lolo Jones unfolded as the highlight of the Gugl Meeting on Thursday (2) evening in Linz.
3 February 2012 - Birmingham, UK - World leader Holly Bleasdale will step up her Olympic Pole Vault preparations at the Aviva Grand Prix in Birmingham, the penultimate IAAF Indoor Permit Meeting, on Saturday 18 February.